Senior researcher = d00d - a follow-up
In this forum I usually complain about shit and then forget to provide you with the outcome (even though some of you sometimes specifically ask for it). But today I will make an exception to the rule. As Cath suggested in a comment to my previous post, I sent an email appr. like the one below. I fought a hard fight with a strong urge to be a bitch, since I rather want allies than enemies of the cause [and I don't really like conflicts, but don't tell anyone].
Dear FemaleScientist,
I’m writing regarding the advertisement for a job at Governmental Research Institute that you posted on EmailList yesterday. I’m not interested in the position per se, but I’m very interested to know the reason why the position is open to men only (I assume that is the case since the text specifically states that the researcher Governmental Research Institute will hire will “define HIS [emphasis mine] own topic....”).
I’m partly joking here, and I realize it’s probably just a result of unfortunate wording, but if I were a some kind of -ologist, and wanted to apply for the job, I would probably find the advertisment pretty disscouraging. Anyway, I wish you good luck in finding the best candidate for the job.
Best regards,
HGG
I didn't really expect a reply, but my inbox today produced the following:
Yes, it’s a mistake,
Best regards,
FemaleScientist
Is that a standard response sent to all complainers? Or just a "WTF, leave me alone, you're pathetic"? Hopfully someone will think a little more before posting another ad, but I'm not sure I secured a supporter.

